JAHNARD BONAMY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Allegations of coercion in a guilty plea are conclusively refuted by the plea colloquy and written plea agreement, and no evidentiary hearing is required.
[1] Allegations of coercion in a guilty plea that are conclusively refuted by the plea colloquy and written plea agreement do not require an evidentiary hearing.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The coercion alleged after sentencing is refuted by the transcript and the written plea agreement. An evidentiary hearing was unnecessary.”
Citation to Rivera v. State, 984 So. 2d 574, 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
Bonamy appealed from a circuit court decision, alleging coercion in connection with his guilty plea.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Evidentiary Hearing Requirement cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JAHNARD BONAMY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D20-149
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 6, 2021
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Jessica J. Recksiedler, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, III, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
2
AFFIRMED. See Johnson v. State, 22 So. 3d 840, 845 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) ("These statements in the plea colloquy and plea agreement conclusively refuted Johnson's broad allegation that she was coerced by someone, possibly her attorney, into entering the plea."); Rivera v. State, 984 So. 2d 574, 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) ("The coercion alleged after sentencing is refuted by the transcript and the written plea agreement. An evidentiary hearing was unnecessary."); Wallace v. State, 939 So. 2d 1123, 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("Because the allegations of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel are conclusively refuted by the record, there is no need to hold an evidentiary hearing.").
WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. State, 22 So. 3d 840 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- Wallace v. State, 939 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Rivera v. State, 984 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)