J. B. SOUTHARD, ET AL.,
v.
J. W. JOHNSON
J. B. SOUTHARD, ET AL.,
J. W. JOHNSON
117 Fla. 666
Florida Supreme Court (1934)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 158 So. 169
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This case is before us on writ of error to review the judgment of .the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit in and for Walton County.
The record fails to show exceptions taken to the order of court overruling motion for new trial. In fact, the record fails to show any order of court made on the motion or that the same was' ever brought to the attention of the court, except in the bill of exceptions.
Because of the state of the record, we cannot say that reversible error has been made to appear.
The judgment should be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Davis, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Yoder v. Venancio A. Adriatico, 459 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…below otherwise is affirmed. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. . See also Chomont v. Ward, 103 So. 2d 635, (Fla.1958), and Southard v. Johnson, 117 Fla. 666, 158 So. 169 (1934).…
-
City OF Pompano Beach v. Edwards, 129 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)…, filed in accordance with Rule 2.7b, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure [31 F.S.A.], if the proper procedure had not been employed by defendant in making a motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.” In Southard et al. v. Johnson, 117 Fla. 666, 158 So. 169, 170, the Court stated as to the failure of the record to show that a motion was made: “The record fails to show exceptions taken to the order of court overruling motion for new trial. In fact, the record fails to show any order of cou…