WILLIAM PERRY WALTON, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-06-23
No. 21-0139
Steele, J., Warner, J., Gerber, J., Kuntz, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief that is legally insufficient must be denied, regardless of whether the trial court also erred in finding it untimely.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant has two years from the date of the circuit court's mandate on appeal in which to file a rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

William Perry Walton, Jr. filed a rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief in Martin County, which the trial court denied. Walton appealed the deni…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Kuntz

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIAM PERRY WALTON, JR., Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D21-139

[June 23, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Darren Steele, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432017MM001683AXMX and 432020AP000012AXMX.

William Perry Walton, Jr., Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief because it was legally insufficient. We do note that the court erred in determining that it was untimely, as appellant had two years from the date of the circuit court’s mandate on appellant’s appeal in which to file his motion for relief. See Huff v. State, 569 So. 2d 1247, 1250–51 (Fla. 1990); Ghent v. State, 27 So. 3d 121, 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw