DAVID W. SHAW, D.C., P.A. A/A/O NATASHA CARSON
v.
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of GEICO Indemnity Company was affirmed based on controlling precedent.
David W. Shaw, D.C., P.A., acting on behalf of Natasha Carson, appealed a judgment from St. Lucie County Court against GEICO Indemnity Company.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse PIP cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
DAVID W. SHAW, D.C., P.A. a/a/o LATASHA CARSON, Appellant,
v.
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D21-71
[June 30, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Daryl
J.
Isenhower, Judge;
L.T.
Case No. 562019AP000036, 562019SC000482.
Michelle J. Kane of Kane Lawyers, PLLC, Delray Beach, for appellant.
Andrew T. Lynn and Michael C. Clarke of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Alliance Spine & Joint, III, LLC a/a/o Audrey Belmonte v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 4D21-134, 2021 WL 2010300, 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1149a (Fla. 4th DCA May 19, 2021).
KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ, and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.