GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
v.
HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPEDICS A/A/O BARTHEL ESTENI
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of Hallandale Beach Orthopedics was affirmed.
GEICO Indemnity Company appealed a judgment entered by the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County in favor of Hallandale …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPAEDIC a/a/o BARTHEL ESTENI, Appellee.
No. 4D21-209
[June 30, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Mardi Levey Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE19-5404 and COCE16-20784.
Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz-Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.
David B. Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines and Amir Fleischer of Marks & Fleischer, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Geico Indem. Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A., No. 4D21- 457 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021).
GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.