RICHARD SHANE MILLER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-07-07
No. 20-2795
Heisey, J., Gross, J., May, J., Forst, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on the controlling precedent of Anderson v. State, 229 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).


Facts & Procedural History

Richard Shane Miller appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in Okeechobee County. The case involved criminal c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Forst

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD SHANE MILLER, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D20-2795

[July 7, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael Heisey, Judge;

L.T.

Case No. 472018CF000730A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Anderson v. State, 229 So. 3d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw