JENEEN CARTER-CHISM
v.
JANE DOE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-08-25
No. 21-2042
Kaplan, J., Gross, J., May, J., Artau, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's denial of the petition for injunction for protection against stalking was affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant Jeneen Carter-Chism filed a petition for an injunction for protection against stalking against Jane Doe in the Circuit Court for the Sevente…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Artau

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JENEEN CARTER-CHISM, Appellant,

v.

JANE DOE, Appellee.

No. 4D21-2042

[August 25, 2021]

Appeal of order denying petition for injunction from protection against stalking from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael G. Kaplan, Judge; L.T. Case No. DVCE21- 004169.

Jeneen Carter-Chism, Coral Springs, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

GROSS, MAY and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw