WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR
v.
COACH HOUSES AT LEESBURG CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who abuses the judicial process through repetitive, frivolous, and malicious filings may be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings in those cases.
[1] A court may prohibit a pro se litigant from filing further pro se pleadings in specific cases when the litigant abuses the judicial process through repetitive, frivolous,…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
The court cited this phrase from Isley v. State when imposing the pro se filing prohibition.
William Michael Windsor filed multiple abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking various orders in two Lake County Circuit…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Legal Process cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
WILLIAM MICHAEL WINDSOR,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 5D21-1281
COACH HOUSES AT LEESBURG
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Respondent.
________________________/
Opinion filed August 30, 2021
Petition for Writ of Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Lake County, James R. Baxley, Judge.
William Michael Windsor, Leesburg, pro se.
Therese A. Savona and Geraldine P. Pena, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking various orders in Lake County Circuit Court Case Numbers 2019-CA-001871 and 2020-CA- 001647, this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer,
2
751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the Response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced cases. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced cases. Any future filings regarding the referenced cases will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”).
FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
WALLIS, SASSO and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)