KEVIN O. TAYLOR
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 5th DCA | 2021-09-24
No. 21-1770
Eisnaugle, J., Harris, J., Wozniak, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A petitioner whose habeas corpus filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous may be sanctioned with a bar on pro se filings and referral for disciplinary proceedings.


Headnotes

[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant whose filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous by imposing a bar on future pro se filings and referring the matter…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Kevin O. Taylor, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case Number 2015-CF-001788-…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Wozniak

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

KEVIN O. TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D21-1770

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 24, 2021

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Kevin O. Taylor, Orlando, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Seminole County Circuit Court Case Number 2015- CF-001788-A. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro

2 se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from the identified case number may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2021); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).

PETITIONER WARNED.

EISNAUGLE, HARRIS and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw