AUTOLINE, LLC
v.
JANICE MADDEN STUART
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court cannot reverse a trial court's judgment without a record of the trial proceedings to review the underlying factual issues.
[1] An appellate court cannot properly review a trial court's judgment on the merits without a complete record of the trial proceedings to determine whether the judgment is s…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence.”
Court's citation to Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee in affirming the judgment
Autoline, LLC appealed a judgment entered by the County Court for Broward County in two consolidated cases against Janice Madden-Stuart.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
AUTOLINE, LLC, Appellant,
v.
JANICE MADDEN-STUART, Appellee.
No. 4D21-425
[October 20, 2021]
Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Davis, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. COSO19-7739 and CACE20-2862.
Ryan N. Chae of RNC Legal, Hollywood, for appellant.
Janice Madden-Stuart, West Park, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence[.]”).
WARNER, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.