LEZA S. TELLAM
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE OF UPLAND MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A party who abuses the judicial process through abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings may be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings in the case.
[1] A court may prohibit a party from filing further pro se pleadings when the party has engaged in abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings that constitute an ab…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
Court's citation to Isley v. State in support of the prohibition on future pro se filings.
Appellant Leza S. Tellam filed abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se pleadings in a foreclosure case against Bank of America and Wilming…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conservation Of Judicial Resources cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
LEZA S. TELLAM,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-0617
LT Case No. 2016-CA-010961-O
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND
SOCIETY, FSB, AS TRUSTEE OF
UPLAND MORTGAGE LOAN
TRUST A,
Appellees.
/
Opinion filed October 15, 2021
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Denise Beamer, Judge Chad K. Alvaro, Judge.
Leza S. Tellam, Winter Park, pro se.
Michael Rak, of Lender Legal PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of Upland Mortgage Loan Trust A.
No Appearance for Other Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Due to Appellant’s apparent abuse of the legal process by her abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings in the above-styled case, which
2
continued long after the case was dismissed, this Court issued an Order directing Appellant to show cause why she should not be prohibited from future pro se filings in this case. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having carefully considered the Response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed, we conclude that she is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings in this case. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings in Case Number 5D21-0617. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings in this case. Any future filings regarding the above-styled case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”).
FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)