PATRICK BOYD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-12-22
No. 21-1856
Bober, J., Warner, J., May, J., Klingensmith, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court properly denied Boyd's Rule 3.800 motion for post-conviction relief.


Facts & Procedural History

Patrick Boyd filed a Rule 3.800 motion in the Circuit Court for Broward County challenging his conviction in case number 05-015814CF10A. The trial cou…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
Klingensmith

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PATRICK BOYD, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D21-1856

[December 22, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-015814CF10A.

Patrick Boyd, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Roughton v. State, 185 So. 3d 1207, 1210 (Fla. 2016) (as to Issue 1); Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137, 142 (Fla. 2002) (as to Issue 2); see Cadet v. State, 274 So. 3d 1178, 1179–80 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (as to Issue 3).

WARNER, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw