CHUKI P. DAVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petitioner whose habeas corpus filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous may be sanctioned with a bar on pro se filings and referral for disciplinary proceedings.
[1] A court may sanction a pro se litigant whose filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous by imposing a bar on future pro se filings and referring the matter…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceChuki P. Davis, a pro se petitioner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 2005-CF-13289. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Disciplinary Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
CHUKI P. DAVIS,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D21-2916 L.T. Case No. 2005-CF-013289-A-O
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 30, 2021
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Chuki P. Davis, Crestview, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
This Court earlier denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 2005-CF-13289. Because it appears that Petitioner’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious or frivolous, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims arising from or related to Orange County Circuit Court Case
2 Number 2005-CF-13289 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filings in this Court and referral to prison officials for consideration of disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2021); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.