WILLIAM R. PICKETT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se petitioner may be cautioned and threatened with sanctions, including a bar on future pro se filings and referral for disciplinary proceedings, when his filings are determined to be abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous.
[1] A court may warn a pro se litigant that further filings asserting claims stemming from the same case that are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous may result in s…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWilliam R. Pickett, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court regarding Orange County Circuit Court Case No…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
WILLIAM R. PICKETT,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D22-203 LT Case No. 2017-CF-3374
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 11, 2022
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
William R. Pickett, Orlando, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Because it appears that Appellant’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2017-CF-3374 may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings,
2 which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
APPELLANT CAUTIONED.
COHEN, EDWARDS and SASSO, JJ., concur.