MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN, CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO
v.
VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in the landlord-tenant case was affirmed.
This was a nonfinal appeal from Orange County County Court involving a dispute between tenants (Marambio, Soto Olguin, Soto, and Soto) and a landlord …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MARGARET MARAMBIO, CARLOS R. SOTO OLGUIN,
CARLOS AUGUSTIN SOTO AND
MARGARET KATHERINE SOTO, Appellants, v. Case No. 5D21-2456 LT Case No. 2021-CC-001240-O VIKRAM KHANDELWALVS, Appellee. ________________________________/ Decision filed May 31, 2022 Nonfinal Appeal from the County Court for Orange County, Elizabeth Starr, Judge. Debi V. Rumph, of The Law Offices of Debi V. Rumph, Orlando, for Appellants. Charles Patrick Brady, of Charles Brady Law, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
EVANDER and SASSO, JJ., concur. LAMBERT, C.J., dissents, without opinion.