STEVEN RAY BACAK
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The circuit court's decision on Bacak's Rule 3.800 motion was affirmed.
Steven Ray Bacak appealed from the Circuit Court for Seminole County regarding multiple criminal cases (2015-CF-1845, 2018-CF-2467, 2015-CF-1648, 2018…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
STEVEN RAY BACAK, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. 5D22-993 LT Case Nos. 2015-CF-1845 2018-CF-2467 2015-CF-1648 2018-CF-2466 2018-CF-2671
Appellee _______________________________/ Decision filed June 7, 2022 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Melanie Chase, Judge. Steven R. Bacak, Monticello, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Ruff v. State, 840 So. 2d 1145, 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Williams v. State, 825 So. 2d 994, 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ruff v. State, 840 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Williams v. State, 825 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)