TIMOTHY C. NIX VS TAMPA MARRIOTT WESTSHORE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appeal from a final order of the Florida Commission on Human Relations is not properly cognizable in the district court of appeal.
[1] Appeals from final orders of the Florida Commission on Human Relations are not properly cognizable in the district court of appeal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTimothy C. Nix appealed a decision from the Florida Commission on Human Relations regarding a dispute with Tampa Marriott Westshore.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2022-3594 _____________________________
TIMOTHY C. NIX,
Appellant,
v.
TAMPA MARRIOTT WESTSHORE,
Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Florida Commission on Human Relations. Cheyanne M. Costilla, Executive Director.
December 13, 2023
PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Gershman v. Fla. Elections Comm’n, 127 So. 3d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROWE and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ 2 Timothy C. Nix, pro se, Appellant. Dawn Siler-Nixon, Ford & Harrison LLP, Tampa; Steven Reardon, Ford & Harrison LLP, Miami, for Appellee.