JEFFREY SISKIND
v.
ZOKAITES PROPERTIES, LP AND TALAVERA ASSOCIATION, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A county court violates due process by adjudicating a person as a vexatious litigant under section 68.093, Florida Statutes, without providing a hearing.
[1] A court must provide a hearing before adjudicating a person as a vexatious litigant under section 68.093, Florida Statutes, as the absence of a hearing violates due proce…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSiskind appealed from county court orders adjudicating him as a vexatious litigant and a clarifying order. Talavera Association, Inc. filed a confessi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Confession Of Error cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
JEFFREY MARC SISKIND, Appellant,
v.
ZOKAITES PROPERTIES, LP and TALAVERA ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellees.
No. 4D2026-1007
[July 1, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Sara Alijewicz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502021CC009447XXXXWB.
Jeffrey Marc Siskind, Wellington, pro se.
Ryan Michael Aboud of Ryan M. Aboud, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee Talavera Association, Inc.
No appearance for appellee Zokaites Properties, LP.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Jeffrey Marc Siskind appeals from the county court's order granting the motion to adjudicate Siskind as a vexatious litigant and the subsequent order clarifying the same pursuant to section 68.093, Florida Statutes (2026). Talavera Association, Inc. filed a confession of error conceding that the orders entered without a hearing violated due process. We agree.
Based on the proper confession of error, we reverse the county court's orders and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
MAY, CONNER and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.