DANA ANN WILLMENG, ET AL.
v.
JULIANNE SCHECKEL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of the appellee was affirmed.
This case involved a dispute between Dana Ann Willmeng, Brian Richard Poncin, and Gerald G. Poncin, Jr. against Julianne Scheckel. The underlying fact…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
DANA ANN WILLMENG, BRIAN RICHARD PONCIN, and GERALD G. PONCIN, JR., Appellants,
v.
JULIANNE SCHECKEL, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2294
[July 2, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312023CA000963XXXXXX.
August J. Stanton, III, and Juliane Murphy Brumbaugh of Nardella & Nardella, PLLC, Orlando, for appellants.
Aaron Van Johnson and Andrew Bochte of Collins Brown Barkett, Chartered, Vero Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GERBER, FORST and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.