DASMOND T. BRANNON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 6th DCA | 2026-07-02
No. 2024-2603
Franklin, J., Smith, J., Brownlee, J., Pratt, J.
2026 FL 8319 Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere may directly appeal only the lower tribunal's lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant who enters a guilty or nolo contendere plea may directly appeal only the trial court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction, not other issues such as case juri…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere may otherwise directly appeal only the lower tribunal's lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Statement of the controlling legal standard from Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a.

Facts & Procedural History

Dasmond T. Brannon appealed from a judgment in the Circuit Court for Polk County after entering a guilty or nolo contendere plea.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 6D2024-2603 Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-002658

DASMOND T. BRANNON, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County. Sharon M. Franklin, Judge.

July 2, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii)a. (“A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo contendere may otherwise directly appeal only the lower tribunal's lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”); JJJTB, Inc. v. Schmidt, 415 So. 3d 129, 132-33 (Fla. 2025) (“Unlike subject matter jurisdiction, a trial court's case jurisdiction may fluctuate depending on the case's procedural posture. For example, when a court enters a final order in an action, it loses its case jurisdiction but maintains its subject matter jurisdiction over the action. In such cases, the parties

must timely notify the trial court that it lacks case jurisdiction or the objection is waived." (citations omitted)).

SMITH, BROWNLEE and PRATT, JJ., concur.

Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Diana L. Johnson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and J. Wade Stidham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw