KENNEDY
v.
COMERFORD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Sentences of imprisonment for offenses not charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit shall be served consecutively unless the court directs that two or more sentences be served concurrently.
[1] Under Florida Statute § 921.16(1), sentences for offenses not charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit are presumptively consecutive unless the sentencin…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Sentences of imprisonment for offenses not charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit shall be served consecutively unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served concurrently.”
Statutory basis for affirming consecutive sentencing
Daniel W. Kennedy was convicted of multiple offenses and received sentences that the trial court imposed consecutively. Kennedy appealed the consecuti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
DANIEL W. KENNEDY, Appellant,
V.
RICHARD COMERFORD, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.
No. 1D2025-1353
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Jonathan Eric Sjostrom, Judge.
July 8, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See § 921.16(1), Fla. Stat. ("Sentences of imprisonment for offenses not charged in the same indictment, information, or affidavit shall be served consecutively unless the court directs that two or more of the sentences be served concurrently.").
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROWE and RAY, JJ., concur.