EDWIN BERNARD RATTRAY
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rule 3.801 is the exclusive remedy for jail credit issues, and procedural case law on jail credit preceding the rule's enactment is irrelevant.
[1] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 provides the exclusive remedy for jail credit issues, and procedural case law on jail credit predating the rule's enactment is in…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“rule 3.801 is the exclusive remedy for jail credit issues and 'procedural case law on jail credit preceding rule 3.801's enactment is irrelevant'”
Court's citation to Murray v. State in support of affirmance
Edwin Bernard Rattray appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Alachua County regarding jail credit.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-3030
EDWIN BERNARD RATTRAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James Matthew Colaw, Judge.
July 8, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Murray v. State, 397 So. 3d 223, 225 (Fla. 6th DCA 2024) (holding that rule 3.801 is the exclusive remedy for jail credit issues and “procedural case law on jail credit preceding rule 3.801's enactment is irrelevant”); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b).
KELSEY, NORDBY, and NEFF, JJ., concur.