NASH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A probation condition requiring the defendant to pay for urinalysis testing must be orally pronounced by the trial court to be enforceable.
[1] A probation condition requiring payment of costs for urinalysis testing is unenforceable unless the trial court orally pronounces the condition at sentencing.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNash was convicted of attempted first-degree murder with a firearm. The trial court imposed a sentence that included probation with a condition requir…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
SUAVAE ORION NASH, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 1D2024-1870
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Lance Neff, Judge.
July 15, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Suavae Orion Nash appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following his conviction of attempted first-degree murder with a firearm. Because the trial court did not orally pronounce that Nash would be required to pay the costs associated with urinalysis testing as a condition of probation, we reverse the order of probation to strike that condition. We otherwise affirm.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
RAY, WINOKUR, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.