JOHNSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is properly dismissed as impermissibly successive when it violates the successive petition bar.
[1] A petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel may be dismissed as impermissibly successive under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d)(6)(C).
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGeorge L. Johnson, proceeding pro se, filed a petition in the Florida District Court of Appeal, First District, alleging ineffective assistance of app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
GEORGE L. JOHNSON, Petitioner,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
No. 1D2025-2075
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel- Original Jurisdiction.
July 15, 2026
PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as impermissibly successive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).
LEWIS, WINOKUR, and NEFF, JJ., concur.