MARIAJOSE GENSOLLEN PAZOS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA DMV

11th Cir. Ct. App. Div. | 2022-09-06
No. 2022-48-AP-01
1 FLCA 7446 Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, Appellate Division (2022)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Mariajose Gensollen Pazos sought a writ of certiorari to challenge the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles' cancellation of her driver's license due to inability to verify her I-601A immigration waiver approval. The appellate court denied the petition on procedural grounds, finding that the petitioner had failed to exhaust administrative remedies and did not file the petition within the required 30-day window.


Holding

The petition for writ of certiorari was denied because: (1) petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not requesting a hearing as required by statute and administrative rule; and (2) the petitioner had not yet received a final written order from the Department that could serve as the basis for certiorari jurisdiction, as certiorari petitions must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order.


Headnotes

[1] A petition for writ of certiorari is properly before an appellate court only after a party has exhausted all available administrative remedies.

[2] A party seeking administrative review of a driver's license cancellation must first request a hearing before the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“A petition for writ of certiorari is properly before this Court only on a final agency action after the exhaustion of administrative remedies.”

Establishes the requirement to exhaust administrative remedies before certiorari relief can be sought.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner received a cancellation order on August 9, 2022, effective September 7, 2022, canceling her driver's license because the Department could n…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

[*1] Before: TRAWICK, SANTOVENIA, and WALSH, JJ.

TRAWICK, J.

This matter comes before this Court on a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by Mariajose Gensollen Pazos ("Petitioner"). Petitioner's driver's license was cancelled by the State of Florida, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles ("Department") because the Department was unable to verify her Approval Notice I- 601A had been approved in the USCIS database. On September 6, 2022, Petitioner filed the instant Petition.

Factual Background

On August 9, 2022, Petitioner received the Department's Order of Cancellation informing her that "your driver license (sic) and/or identification card is cancelled indefinitely by the state (sic) of Florida, effective 9/7/2022" and explaining that "[y]our Driver License/ID (sic) is due to be cancelled because we are unable to verify your Approval Notice I-601A has been approved in the USCIS Database (sic)."

Petitioner requests a I-601A waiver because she remained in the United States for more than a year beyond a previously- authorized [*2] period of stay in nonimmigrant status. She began this process on May 27, 2020, but she contends that the process has been delayed through no fault of her own. Petitioner maintains that processing times for I-601A waiver applications have increased from 4.6 months in 2017 to 30.7 months in 2022.

Discussion

Section 322.271(1)(a). Fla. Stat. provides, in relevant part, that:

... Upon the suspension, cancellation, or revocation of the driver license of any person as authorized or required in this chapter, the department shall immediately notify the licensee and, upon his or her request, shall afford him or her an opportunity for a hearing pursuant to chapter 120, as early as practicable within not more than 30 days after receipt of such request, in the county wherein the licensee resides, unless the department and the licensee agree that such hearing may be held in some other county.

Rule 15A-1.0195, Fla. Admin. Code (Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles - Division of Driver Licenses) states:

Any person whose driving privilege has been cancelled, suspended or revoked, may petition the Department for an administrative review to present evidence showing why their driving privilege should not have been cancelled, suspended or revoked. Application for such review shall be made by personal letter [*3] specifying the action for which the review is requested, and the documents in the possession of the Department which the licensee requests to review.

A petition for writ of certiorari is properly before this Court only on a final agency action after the exhaustion of administrative remedies. Pursuant to § 322.271, Fla. Stat., this Court finds that the Petitioner has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies since she has never requested a hearing. Instead, once she received a notice of suspension, she filed a motion for rehearing. Petitioner should consider the Department's suggestion that she file a request for a show cause hearing with the Bureau of Administrative Review, as authorized by Rule 15A-1.0195, Fla. Admin. Code, when she arguably has sufficient evidence to sustain her burden of proof before the hearing officer. Should the Petitioner fail to receive a timely hearing upon such a request, a petition for writ of mandamus may be appropriate.

Additionally, the law requires a party seeking certiorari relief to file the petition within 30 days after the rendition of the order to be reviewed. Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1). "An order is rendered when a signed, written order is filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal." Fla. [*4] R.App. P. 9.020(e) & (h). We have certiorari jurisdiction only to address an order rendered by the Department. As of yet, there is no order below from which we could grant certiorari relief.

For the foregoing reasons, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is

DENIED.

SANTOVENIA and WALSH JJ., concur. COPIES FURNISHED TO COUNSEL

OF RECORD AND TO ANY PARTY

NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw