A. P.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, STATEWIDE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's order in the dependency proceeding was affirmed.
A.P. appealed a circuit court decision in a dependency case involving three children (T.P., A.P.1, and A.P.2) in Hillsborough County. The Department o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of T.P, A.P.1, and A.P.2, children.
Α.Ρ.,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and
GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,
Appellees.
No. 2D2026-0114
July 17, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Richard H. Martin, Judge.
David A. Dee, Tampa, for Appellant.
Mary Soorus, Appellate Counsel, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.
Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem Office.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.