CARTER D. HEUTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment is affirmed because the holding in Erlinger v. United States does not apply retroactively.
[1] A holding announced in a United States Supreme Court decision does not apply retroactively to cases on appeal unless the applicable retroactivity doctrine permits such ap…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“does not apply retroactively”
The court cited Wainwright v. State for the proposition that the holding in Erlinger v. United States does not apply retroactively.
Carter D. Heuton appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Bradford County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
CARTER D. HEUTON, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 1D2025-3063
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. James M. Colaw, Judge.
July 29, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392, 399 (Fla. 2025) (stating that the holding in Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), “does not apply retroactively").
BILBREY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (U.S. 2024)
- Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025)