LILA M. AGUILAR AND JOSE M. JAIMES-BENITEZ
v.
MATEO-JUAN GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ AND MAYRA RAMIREZ-JAIMES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of the appellees was affirmed.
Aguilar and Jaimes-Benitez appealed a judgment entered by the trial court in favor of Gonzalez-Gonzalez and Ramirez-Jaimes in a civil action.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
LILA M. AGUILAR and JOSE M. JAIMES-BENITEZ, Appellants,
V.
MATEO-JUAN GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ and MAYRA RAMIREZ-JAIMES, Appellees.
No. 4D2025-3057
[July 29, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Bradley G. Harper, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502024CA006171XXXAMB.
Gary Brookmyer of Brookmyer, Hochman, Probst & Jonas, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellants.
No brief filed on behalf of appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Delio v. Landman, 987 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).
CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Delio v. Elliot Landman and Meghan Beuttenmuller, 987 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)