HEIDI PADILLA, INC.
v.
BANKERS TITLE & ESCROW SERVICES, INC., ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An assigned error is deemed abandoned when completely omitted from the appellate brief.
[1] An assigned error is deemed abandoned and waived when completely omitted from the appellate brief, and such omitted issues may not be considered on appeal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“An assigned error will be deemed to have been abandoned when it is completely omitted from the briefs.”
Court citing Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conser. Comm'n v. Daws, 256 So. 3d 907, 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
Heidi Padilla, Inc. appealed a circuit court judgment against it in a case involving Bankers Title & Escrow Services, Inc. and other defendants.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 30, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-0868 Lower Tribunal No. 17-23182-CA-01
Heidi Padilla, Inc., Appellant,
vs.
Bankers Title & Escrow Services, Inc., et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Javier A. Enriquez, Judge.
Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., and Bard D. Rockenbach (West Palm Beach); Richard J. Diaz P.A., and Richard J. Diaz, for appellant.
Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston, & Zimet, LLP, and Kenneth R. Drake, and Audrey Fernandez, for appellee Bankers Title & Escrow Services Inc.
Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Ashear v. Sklarey, 247 So. 3d 574, 578 n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“This issue was not raised in the initial brief and may not be considered on appeal.”); Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conser. Comm'n'n v. Daws, 256 So. 3d 907, 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (“An assigned error will be deemed to have been abandoned when it is completely omitted from the briefs." (quoting City of Miami v. Steckloff, 111 So. 2d 446, 447 (Fla. 1959) (Makar, J, dissenting)); Polyglycoat Corp. v. Hirsch Distribs., Inc., 442 So. 2d 958, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (“When points, positions, facts and supporting authorities are omitted from the brief, a court is entitled to believe that such are waived, abandoned, or deemed by counsel to be unworthy.”).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Polyglycoat Corp. v. Hirsch Distribs., Inc., 442 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- City OF Miami v. Steckloff, 111 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1959)
- Fla. Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n v. Daws, 256 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
- Ashear v. Sklarey, 247 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)