MICHAEL PAUL SCOTT
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2026-07-30
No. 2025-2853
Roby, J., Ciklin, J., Conner, J., Klingensmith, J.
2026 FL 9774 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment was affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Michael Paul Scott appealed from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL PAUL SCOTT, Appellant,

V.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2853

[July 30, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William Loy Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432022CF000369CFAXMX.

Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw