FRANCIS, CUNNINGHAM, AND DUBOSE
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL INS. CO.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment in favor of State Farm was affirmed.
Three individuals—Francis, Cunningham, and Dubose—brought an action against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The case was tried in the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Automobile Insurance Policy Coverage cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT SHELDON ANTHONY FRANCIS, NATOYA FIONA CUNNINGHAM, and JAMAHAL DUBOSE, Appellants, V.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2973 [July 30, 2026] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062023CA003353AXXXCE.
Henry A. Seiden of Seiden Law, Boynton Beach, for appellant Jamahal Dubose.
Sheldon Anthony Francis, Lauderhill, pro se. Natoya Fiona Cunningham, Pompano Beach, pro se. Adam A. Duke, Derek L. Veliz, and Jenna A. De Stefano of Young, Bill, Palmer, Duke, Thompson & Alexander, P.A., Miami, for appellee. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.