JERRY GALLION
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant may be subject to Spencer Sanctions for filing abusive, repetitive, malicious, and frivolous pleadings that constitute an abuse of the court's process.
[1] A pro se litigant may be subject to Spencer Sanctions for filing abusive, repetitive, malicious, and frivolous pleadings that constitute an abuse of the appellate court's…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Petitioner continues to file pleadings that are an attempt to revisit issues which are abusive, repetitive, malicious, frivolous, and an abuse of this Court's process.”
Court's characterization of the petitioner's filings in its order
Jerry Gallion, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for prohibition and subsequently filed a response to the court's order to show cause. The pleadings…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Abuse Of Court Process cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2883 LT Case No. 16-2021-CF-003597-AXXXMA
JERRY GALLION, Petitioner,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
Petition for Prohibition,
R. Anthony Salem, Respondent Judge.
Jerry Gallion, Milton, pro se. No Appearance for Respondent.
July 31, 2026
WALLIS, J.
After reviewing Petitioner's Response to this Court's Order to Show Cause dated May 8, 2026, it is clear that Petitioner continues to file pleadings that are an attempt to revisit issues which are abusive, repetitive, malicious, frivolous, and an abuse of this Court's process. As such, Petitioner is cautioned that any further pro se pleadings filed in this Court asserting the claim raised in Duval County Case No. 16-2021-CF-003597-AXXXMA may result
in Spencer Sanctions being imposed. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999).
PETITIONER WARNED.
EISNAUGLE and KILBANE, JJ., concur.