RICHARD TITUS, ET AL.
v.
SONI & SONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A deed duly executed and describing land sufficiently to enable identification vests title in the grantee upon delivery, and adverse possession by color of title requires a recorded written instrument describing the property and continuous possession for seven years.
[1] A deed duly executed and describing property sufficiently to enable identification vests title in the grantee upon delivery of the deed.
[2] Adverse possession by color of title under Florida law requires both a written instrument recorded in official county records describing the property and continuous posse…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A deed to land, duly executed, describing such land sufficiently to enable a surveyor from such description to locate said land on the ground, vests in the grantee the title thereto of the grantor as of the time of the delivery of the deed.”
Hardee v. Horton, 108 So. 189, 210 (Fla. 1925)
Richard Titus and others appealed a circuit court decision in Monroe County regarding property title and ownership disputes involving Soni & Sons Limi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 6, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-1880 Lower Tribunal No. 21-CA-468-K
Richard Titus, et al., Appellants,
vs.
Soni & Sons Limited Partnership Agreement, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones, Judge.
Highsmith & Van Loon, P.A., and David Van Loon and Olivia Freeman, for appellants.
Hershoff, Lupino & Yagel, LLP and Joanne Pereira, James S. Lupino, and Russell A. Yagel, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. See Hardee v. Horton, 108 So. 189, 210 (Fla. 1925) (“A deed to land, duly executed, describing such land sufficiently to enable a surveyor from such description to locate said land on the ground, vests in the grantee the title thereto of the grantor as of the time of the delivery of the deed."); Miami Holding Corp. v. Matthews, 311 So. 2d 802, 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) ("[I]t is an accepted principle of law that the delivery of a complete deed executed by a grantor who had title to the land invests the grantee with title[.]"); Seton v. Swann, 650 So. 2d 35, 36–37 (Fla. 1995) (“[A] party must meet two requirements to acquire title through adverse possession by color of title under section 95.16: First, the property must be described in a written instrument recorded in official county records, and, second, the property must be possessed continuously for seven years."); Moore v. Musa, 198 So. 2d 843, 847 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967) (“To be effective as color of title, an instrument must purport to convey the land involved and contain a proper description by which the property may be identified. Color of title means only an apparent or semblance of title as opposed to actual title.... The deeds purporting to convey title to the disputed property and containing a proper description of the overlapping property, though defective because of want to title in the grantor, may be relied on as color or title.”); Frazier v. Goszczynski, 161 So. 3d 542, 545 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (finding that a quitclaim deed, if conveyed in "good faith and with the belief that it constitutes a legitimate conveyance of title” will "satisfy the color of title requirement”); Porter v. Lorene Inv. Co., 297 So. 2d 622, 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974) (“The pertinent time for determining the ownership of the disputed parcel commences when [adverse possessor's] predecessor in title [] reduced the disputed land to his possession and control. The record reveals that this was done... when [the predecessor] completely enclosed the land with a fence.").
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cary A. Hardee v. Horton, 90 Fla. 452 (Fla. 1925)
- Lily Theo Moore v. Musa, 198 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Porter v. Lorene Inv. Co., 297 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Seton v. Swann, 650 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1995)
- Miami Holding Corp. v. Matthews, 311 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Frazier v. Goszczynski, 161 So. 3d 542 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)