FRANCISCO A. MONTEAGUDO
v.
WILLIAM M. BUSTAMANTE, ESQ.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2026-08-06
No. 2025-1840
Gordo, J., Lobree, J., Gooden, J., Arzola, J.
2026 FL 10031 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment in favor of Bustamante was affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Francisco A. Monteagudo appealed a judgment entered against him in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court in a case involving attorney William M. Bustamante.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 6, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-1840 Lower Tribunal No. 23-22426-CA-01

Francisco A. Monteagudo, Appellant,

vs.

William M. Bustamante, Esq., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge.

Lorium Law, and Joseph D. Garrity (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.

Marlow Adler Abrams & Rotunno, and Philip E. Glatzer, and Jose Valdes, for appellee.

Before GORDO, LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw