CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC
v.
MICHAEL TESSENEAR, CARY L. TESSENEAR, AND STEVEN K. JONAS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 4785 OAKFIELD CIRCLE TRUST, DATED, FEBRUARY 28, 2006
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When an underlying final judgment of foreclosure is reversed, any certificate of title issued pursuant to that judgment is void and the order denying a motion to add property information to that judgment must be reversed.
[1] A certificate of title issued pursuant to a final judgment of foreclosure is void and of no legal force or effect when the underlying foreclosure judgment is reversed on…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCarrington Mortgage Services sought to add mobile home information to the trial court's summary final judgment and certificate of title following a ju…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Legal Description Of Property cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2502 LT Case No. 2014-CA-000123
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE
SERVICES, LLC, Appellant,
V.
MICHAEL TESSENEAR, CARY L.
TESSENEAR, and STEVEN K. JONAS, as Trustee of the 4785 Oakfield Circle Trust, Dated, February 28, 2006, Appellees.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Pamela S. Vergara, Judge.
Eric M. Levine, of Atlas | Solomon LLP, Stuart, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellees.
August 14 2026
PER CURIAM.
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, appeals the order denying its motion to add mobile home information to the trial court's summary final judgment and certificate of title issued following judicial sale of the subject foreclosed property.1 We reverse.
For reasons discussed in our opinion in the companion appeal in case number 5D2025-1687, we reversed the underlying final judgment of foreclosure and remanded for further proceedings.2 Because the final judgment has been reversed, the certificate of title issued subsequent to the foreclosure sale required thereby is no longer of any legal force or effect. As a result, the order subject of Carrington's otherwise meritorious appeal in this case is due to be reversed.
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying Carrington's motion to add mobile home information to the trial court's summary final judgment and resulting certificate of title and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
JAY, C.J., and SOUD and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.