Z.L.J., A CHILD.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must enter a separate written order of probation revocation that specifically identifies the conditions of probation that were violated.
[1] When revoking probation, a trial court must enter a separate written order that specifically identifies the conditions of probation that the probationer was found to have…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA child's probation was revoked after she entered a plea that the trial court accepted as knowingly and freely given. The trial court failed to enter …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2025-2695 LT Case Nos. 2025-CJ-000168-A 2025-CJ-000490-A
Z.L.G., A CHILD, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Bradley E. King, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Teresa D. Sutton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
August 14, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's probation was revoked based upon her entry of a plea, which the trial court accepted as having been knowingly and freely given. However, the lower tribunal failed to enter the required written order identifying the conditions of probation that Appellant was found to have violated. There being no other error apparent on the face of the record, we affirm.¹ However, we remand to the lower tribunal for entry of a separate written order of revocation which sets forth the conditions of probation that Appellant was found to have violated. See Mack v. State, 694 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); J.K. v. State, 350 So. 3d 135, 136 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) (citing A.T.J.F. v. State, 78 So. 3d 57, 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED.
EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987)