LUIZ KEEPERMAN
v.
ZM MWC OWNER, LLC, ETC.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2026-08-19
No. 2026-1111
Ortiz, J., Logue, J., Lindsey, J., Gordo, J.
2026 FL 10577 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2026)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's order is affirmed because appellant demonstrated no preliminary basis for reversal.


Headnotes

[1] Under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), an appellate court may summarily affirm a lower tribunal's order when the appellant has demonstrated no preliminary ba…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Luiz Keeperman appealed an order from Miami-Dade County Court. The specific underlying facts are not detailed in this summary affirmance opinion.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 19, 2026.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D26-1111

Lower Tribunal No. 26-34627-CC-05

Luiz Keeperman,

Appellant,

vs.

ZM MWC Owner, LLC, etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria D. Ortiz, Judge.

Luiz Keeperman, in proper person.

Barfield McCain Ayoub, P.A., and Elizabeth S. Rivera (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the initial brief, the record, and the order under review, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, we summarily affirm. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a); Fla. Detroit Diesel v. Nathai, 28 So. 3d 182, 184 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“We have elected to review the order under the summary disposition procedure in rule 9.315(a) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. This rule authorizes an appellate court to summarily affirm an order of the lower tribunal if 'no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated.").

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw