Q.C., A CHILD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied the motion to suppress because the stop was supported by the totality of the circumstances.
Q.C., a child, was stopped and sought to suppress evidence obtained from that stop. The trial court denied the motion to suppress.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fourth Amendment (Search And Seizure) cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 20, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-1145 Lower Tribunal No. J24-1038
Q.C., a Child, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Orlando Prescott, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Haccord J. Curry, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Q.C., a child, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. Based on the testimony and the totality of the circumstances, we affirm. See State v. Maxwell, 245 So. 3d 994, 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (reversing trial court's grant of a motion to suppress a stop).
Affirmed.