ALJANARD XAVIER JACKSON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA AND POLK COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A pro se litigant who makes knowing misrepresentations of fact to the court may be barred from further pro se filings in that matter to conserve judicial resources and prevent abuse of the judicial process.
[1] A court may bar a pro se litigant from filing further petitions in a particular matter when the litigant has made knowing misrepresentations to the court and continues to…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Enough is enough.”
Citation to Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), expressing the court's determination that repeated abuse of the judicial process must be curtailed.
Aljanard Xavier Jackson filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus. On July 14, 2026, the court issued an order directing Jackson to show cause…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Habeas Corpus cases and more on FLexlaw
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2026-1318 LT Case No. 60-2009-CF-773-A
ALJANARD XAVIER JACKSON,
Petitioner,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA AND POLK
COUNTY CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION,
Respondents.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Aljanard Xavier Jackson, Polk City, pro se. No Appearance for Respondents.
August 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
This Court on July 14, 2026, issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed due to his knowing misrepresentations of fact to this Court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410(a). Having carefully considered the response and finding it fails to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed,
we conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning Sumter County Circuit Court Case No. 60-2009-CF- 773-A. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the referenced case. The Clerk will summarily reject any future filings regarding the referenced case unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough."). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
PETITIONER SANCTIONED.
JAY, C.J., and EDWARDS and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)