ALEXANDER ELLIOTT GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE ALEXANDER ELLIOTT GONZALEZ TRUST
v.
JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE AND THE LAGRASSE LLC AND VALUE STORE IT SELF STORAGE, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trustee who is not a licensed attorney cannot represent a trust pro se because doing so constitutes the unauthorized practice of law.
[1] A trustee who is not a licensed attorney cannot represent the trust pro se in court proceedings, as trusts are artificial entities that must be represented by licensed co…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A trust, however, like a corporation, 'is an artificial entity created by law and as such it can neither practice law nor appear or act in person. Out of court it must act in its affairs through its agents and representatives and in matters in court it can act only through licensed attorneys.'”
Court explaining the legal status of trusts and their representation requirements
Alexander Elliott Gonzalez, acting pro se both individually and as trustee of the Alexander Elliott Gonzalez Trust, filed an emergency petition for wr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Certiorari Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2026-2058 Lower Tribunal No. 2026-CA-000463
ALEXANDER ELLIOTT GONZALEZ, individually, and as Trustee of the ALEXANDER ELLIOTT GONZALEZ TRUST,
Petitioner,
V.
JOSEPH D. LAGRASSE, THE LAGRASSE LLC, and VALUE STORE IT SELF STORAGE, LLC,
Respondents.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Osceola County.
August 26, 2026
GANNAM, J.
The Emergency Petition for Writ of Certiorari or, in the Alternative, Emergency Review of Nonfinal Order, docketed August 5, 2026, is signed by Alexander Elliott Gonzalez, pro se, both individually and as Trustee of the Alexander Elliott Gonzalez Trust. The petition seeks review of a nonfinal order denying relief concerning property Gonzalez asserts is owned by the trust. Because Gonzalez is not authorized to represent the trust pro se, we dismiss the petition.
"A natural person may represent himself and present his own case to the court although he is not a licensed attorney." Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Hardee Cnty., 184 So. 2d 438, 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966) (quoting Paradise v. Nowlin, 195 P. 2d 867, 867 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)). A trust, however, like a corporation, “is an artificial entity created by law and as such it can neither practice law nor appear or act in person. Out of court it must act in its affairs through its agents and representatives and in matters in court it can act only through licensed attorneys." Id.; see also J.J. Rissell, Allentown, PA Tr. v. Marchelos, 976 F. 3d 1233, 1235 (11th Cir. 2020) (“A trust, like a corporation, ‘is an artificial entity that can act only through agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel.” (quoting Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F. 2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985))).
Because Gonzalez is not an attorney, “he cannot represent the trust because doing so constitutes the unauthorized practice of law." Lavine v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 226 So. 3d 327, 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017); see also Darst v. W. Coast Grp. Enters., LLC, 380 So. 3d 510, 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024) (“A trustee, pro se, may not appear for the trust."); EHQF Tr. v. S & A Cap. Partners, Inc., 947 So. 2d 606, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“The notice of appeal filed by appellant, a trust, was not signed by an attorney licensed to practice law in Florida. Section 454.23, Florida Statutes (2006), prohibiting the unlicensed practice of law, provides no exception for representation of a trust. . . . [A] trustee cannot appear pro se on behalf of the trust,
because the trustee represents the interests of others and would therefore be engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.").¹
PETITION DISMISSED.
SMITH and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Alexander Elliott Gonzalez, Lakeland, pro se.
No Appearance for Respondents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Palazzo v. Gulf OIL Corp., 764 F.2d 1381 (11th Cir. 1985)
- Nicholson Supply Co., Inc. v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n OF Hardee Cnty., 184 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)
- Ehqf Tr. v. S & A Cap. P'rs, Inc., 947 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)