FOUR SEASON WATER RESTORATION A/A/O NORMAN GONZALEZ
v.
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Where insurance policy language is plain and unambiguous, the court must give the plain language the meaning it clearly expresses, and an insured's failure to protect property from further damage after learning of the damage prejudices the insurer.
[1] An insured's failure to protect property from further damage after learning of the damage prejudices the insurer and is not excused by the insured's belief that the damag…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Where the policy language is plain and unambiguous, no special rule of construction or interpretation applies, and the court should give the plain language in the contract the meaning it clearly expresses.”
Court's statement of the governing rule for interpreting insurance contracts with unambiguous language.
Four Season Water Restoration, acting on behalf of Norman Gonzalez, appealed a county court judgment in a property insurance dispute against Citizens …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Insurance Claim Denial cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed August 27, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-2056
Lower Tribunal No. 20-18242-CC-23
Four Season Water Restoration a/a/o Norman Gonzalez, Appellant,
vs.
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.
Cassel & Cassel, P.A., and Michael A. Cassel (Hollywood), for appellant.
Rothell Law Group, P.A., and Kristi Bergemann Rothell (Greenacres), for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fontainebleau Fla. Hotel LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 408 So. 3d 862, 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“Where the policy language is plain and unambiguous, no special rule of construction or interpretation applies, and the court should give the plain language in the contract the meaning it clearly expresses.” (quoting N. Pointe Cas. Ins. Co. v. M & S Tractor Servs., Inc., 62 So. 3d 1281, 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011))); see also You Restorations LLC v. First Protective Ins. Co., 417 So. 3d 358, 367 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (concluding that the insured's failure to protect the property from further damage after learning of the damage within a few weeks of a windstorm prejudiced the insurer); cf. Sec. First Ins. Co. v. Visca, 387 So. 3d 313, 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (observing that the insured's duty to act on learning of the damage “is not excused simply because the insured believed the damage was not severe enough to justify filing a claim").
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- N. Pointe Cas. Ins. Co. v. M & S Tractor Servs., Inc., 62 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
- Sec. First Ins. Co. v. Visca, 387 So. 3d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
- Fontainebleau Fla. Hotel, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 408 So. 3d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)