TAHJ HALIQUE JONES
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2019-03-13
No. 17-1715
Brobson, Wojcik, Leadbetter
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A juvenile's convictions and sentences are affirmed where they comply with applicable sentencing principles established in Hart v. State.


Headnotes

[1] A court of appeal is bound by precedential decisions of a co-equal appellate court within the same district, even when a panel member disagrees with the controlling rule.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Tahj Halique Jones, a juvenile at the time of the offense, was convicted and sentenced in Santa Rosa County Circuit Court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-1715 _____________________________

TAHJ HALIQUE JONES,

Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. John F. Simon, Judge.

March 13, 2019 PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile at the time of the offense, challenges his criminal judgment and sentences. We affirm appellant’s convictions without comment and affirm his sentences based on Hart v. State, 255 So. 3d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

OSTERHAUS and JAY, JJ., concur; WOLF, J., concurs with opinion.

2

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

WOLF, J., concurring.

I concur on the sentencing issue because I am constrained to do so by Hart v. State, 255 So. 3d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

_____________________________

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw