AMBLER, D/B/A AMBLER LAW GROUP
v.
BAYFRONT SAME DAY SURGERY CENTER, LLC, BAYFRONT ANESTHESIA SERVICES, P. A., ET AL
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court's order granting summary judgment on a charging lien claim based on a written contract must be remanded when the order does not address an alternative quantum meruit claim for attorney's fees that remains pending.
[1] When an attorney asserts alternative theories for recovery of fees—both under a written contract and under quantum meruit—a trial court's order granting summary judgment…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“when a fee agreement between an attorney and client is unenforceable, 'the attorney is entitled to recover on the basis of quantum meruit'”
Court citing King v. Young, Berkman, Berman & Karpf, P.A., 709 So. 2d 572, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
Ambler Law Group, a law firm, asserted a charging lien against trust funds held for clients Ernest Dwayne Davis and Nicole A. Davis, claiming fees bot…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Charging Lien cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
THE LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN C.
AMBLER, P.A., d/b/a AMBLER LAW GROUP,
Appellant,
V.
BAYFRONT SAME DAY SURGERY CENTER, LLC; BAYFRONT ANESTHESIA SERVICES, P.A.; BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; MICHAEL J. ANTONELLI, D.O.; JEFFREY I. MARDER, M.D.; ROBERT LYNN SWYMER, CRNA; TRINA LEANNE ANTONELLI, CRNA.; SANG HEE LEE, CRNA; MARIA S. PRUSHINSKI, R.N.; RACHAEL TEJEDOR, R.N.; LINNEA N. STEWART, R.N.; MICHAEL J. SOLTIS, R.N.; DONALD BLACK, R.N.; and ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS, by and through NICOLE A. DAVIS, as plenary guardian of ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS, a judicially adjudicated mentally incapacitated adult, and NICOLE A. DAVIS, individually, as the spouse of ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS,
Appellees.
No. 2D2024-1634
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
July 18, 2025
The appellant's motion for clarification is granted. The opinion issued on April 2, 2025, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor. The appellant's motion for rehearing is denied, and no further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A TRUE COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.
MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL
CLERK
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
THE LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN C.
AMBLER, P.A., d/b/a AMBLER LAW GROUP,
Appellant,
V.
BAYFRONT SAME DAY SURGERY CENTER, LLC; BAYFRONT ANESTHESIA SERVICES, P.A.; BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; MICHAEL J. ANTONELLI, D.O.; JEFFREY I. MARDER, M.D.; ROBERT LYNN SWYMER, CRNA; TRINA LEANNE ANTONELLI, CRNA; SANG HEE LEE, CRNA; MARIA S. PRUSHINSKI, R.N.; RACHAEL TEJEDOR, R.N.; LINNEA N. STEWART, R.N.; MICHAEL J. SOLTIS, R.N.; DONALD BLACK, R.N.; ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS, by and through NICOLE A. DAVIS, as plenary guardian of ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS, a judicially adjudicated mentally incapacitated adult; and NICOLE A. DAVIS, individually, as the spouse of ERNEST DWAYNE DAVIS,
Appellees.
No. 2D2024-1634
July 18, 2025
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas M. Ramsberger, Judge.
Samuel J. Salario, Jr., and Caroline May Poor of Lawson Huck Gonzalez, PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant.
Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus, Mac A. Greco, Jr., and Andrew J. Wozniak of Greco, Wozniak, & Ruiz-Carus, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees Ernest Dwayne Davis, by and through Nicole A. Davis, as plenary guardian of Ernest Dwayne Davis, a judicially adjudicated mentally incapacitated adult, and Nicole A. Davis, individually, as the spouse of Ernest Dwayne Davis.
No appearance for remaining Appellees.
MORRIS, Judge.
We affirm the order granting the motion for summary judgment on Ambler Law Group's charging lien claim based on the written contract with appellees Ernest Dwayne Davis and Nicole A. Davis.1 However, Ambler Law Group's amended notice of charging lien asserted a claim based on the theory of quantum meruit, and the Davises conceded at oral argument that the order on appeal does not address Ambler Law Group's claim for fees based on the theory of quantum meruit, that Ambler Law Group has a pending claim against the Davises for quantum meruit, and that the funds held in trust should not be released until that claim for quantum meruit is resolved. See, e.g., King v. Young, Berkman, Berman & Karpf, P.A., 709 So. 2d 572, 574 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (holding that when a fee agreement between an attorney and client is unenforceable, "the attorney is entitled to recover on the basis of quantum meruit"). Accordingly, we remand with instructions for the trial court to strike the portion of the order that directs the immediate disbursement of the funds being held in trust.
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.