RONALD KIRKLAND
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A forty-year sentence imposed on a juvenile offender does not constitute a life sentence or its functional equivalent under Pedroza and therefore does not trigger Graham and Miller protections requiring resentencing consideration.
[1] A juvenile offender's sentence does not implicate the protections of Graham v. …
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a juvenile offender's sentence does not implicate Graham [v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010)], and therefore Miller [v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012)], unless it meets the threshold requirement of being a life sentence or the functional equivalent of a life sentence.”
The court's statement of the controlling legal standard from Pedroza v. State
Kirkland was fifteen years old when he committed the crimes at issue and was tried as an adult, receiving a forty-year prison sentence. The Florida Su…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Proportionality Review cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
RONALD KIRKLAND, Appellant,
V.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 1D18-4684
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
J. Scott Duncan, Judge.
March 17, 2021
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Supreme Court quashed our decision in Kirkland v. State, 273 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019), and remanded for our reconsideration in light of Pedroza v. State, 291 So. 3d 541 (Fla. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 341 (2020). See Kirkland v. State, 46 Fla. L. Weekly S1, 2020 WL 7311939, at *1 (Fla. Dec. 11, 2020) (No. SC19-1215).
In Pedroza, the supreme court held that “a juvenile offender's sentence does not implicate Graham [v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010)], and therefore Miller [v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012)], unless it meets the threshold requirement of being a life sentence or the functional equivalent of a life sentence.” Pedroza, 291 So. 3d
at 548. The supreme court in Pedroza approved the Fourth District's affirmance of the denial of resentencing for a juvenile serving a forty-year sentence. Id. at 549.
Kirkland, age fifteen when he committed the crimes at issue, was tried as an adult and received a forty-year prison sentence. See Kirkland v. State, 67 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Under Pedroza, a forty-year sentence is not a life sentence or its functional equivalent. This is particularly true in light of sentence reductions available under section 944.275, Florida Statutes (2008). Because Kirkland has not established that this is “a life sentence or the functional equivalent of a life sentence” as required by Pedroza, we affirm. See Pedroza, 291 So. 3d at 549; see also Hart v. State, Nos. 1D13-1754, 1D13-1810; 46 Fla. L. Weekly D73, 2020 WL 7778999 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec. 31, 2020) (Nos. 1D13-1754, 1D13- 1810) (affirming juvenile's fifty-year sentence as neither a life sentence nor its functional equivalent), petition for review filed, No. SC21-260 (Fla. 2021).
AFFIRMED.
MAKAR, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur.