WILLIAM JARVIS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Consecutive mandatory minimum sentences arising from a single criminal act of placing one bomb are illegal under Florida law.
[1] Consecutive mandatory minimum sentences cannot be imposed for a single criminal act, such as placing one bomb that causes multiple injuries, even if the act results in mu…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“it was improper to impose consecutive mandatory minimum sentences arising from 'the single criminal act of placing [a] bomb.'”
Citation to McGouirk v. State, 493 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1986)
In 2003, Jarvis was convicted of first-degree murder, first-degree arson, and two counts of placing a bomb causing injury. He was sentenced to life im…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Single Criminal Episode Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
WILLIAM JARVIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 1D17-4186
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Marianne L. Aho, Judge.
February 6, 2020
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
The Appellant's motion for rehearing is granted. We hereby withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following opinion in its place.
In 2003, the Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder (count I), first-degree arson (count II), and two counts of placing a bomb causing injury (counts III-IV). He was sentenced to life in prison on each count, with mandatory minimum life sentences imposed on counts II through IV pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes. The sentences in counts I and II were imposed concurrently, count III was imposed consecutively to count I, and count IV was imposed consecutively to count III. Subsequently, the
Appellant filed a motion to correct illegal sentence raising three claims, which the trial court summarily denied. We affirm the denial of his second and third claims without discussion. However, as to the Appellant's first claim, we reverse.
In the Appellant's first claim, he argued that all charges arose from a single criminal episode, during which he placed a single bomb that killed one person and injured two others. He asserted that because he committed a single act resulting in the single discharge of a bomb, his consecutive mandatory minimum sentences are illegal. In McGouirk v. State, 493 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1986), the Florida Supreme Court held that it was improper to impose consecutive mandatory minimum sentences arising from "the single criminal act of placing [a] bomb.” Id. at 1017. Thus, the Appellant's consecutive mandatory minimum sentences in counts III and IV are illegal. We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing on these counts.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
RAY, C.J., and WOLF and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.