SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC
v.
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO INS., CO.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A circuit court may not independently exercise jurisdiction to quash a county court discovery order, and conditional appellate attorneys' fees are available to the prevailing party under section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes.
[1] A circuit court lacks independent jurisdiction to exercise appellate review and quash a county court discovery order; such review must proceed through proper appellate ch…
[2] Conditional appellate attorneys' fees under section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes, may be awarded to a party that ultimately prevails at trial, with consideration given to…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The trial court shall set a fee amount for this appellate proceeding in favor of Petitioner only if Petitioner ultimately prevails at trial, taking into account the fact that Petitioner has not prevailed on all issues and the degree to which this has extended the litigation or increased its costs.”
Court's ruling on conditional appellate attorneys' fees for Shazam Auto Glass
Shazam Auto Glass, as assignee of Christine Jennings, sought a writ of certiorari challenging a circuit court order that quashed a county court discov…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Offer Of Settlement cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC, as assignee ) of Christine Jennings, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) V. ) Case No. 2D19-649 ) STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. ) CO., ) ) Respondent. )
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
Petitioner, Shazam Auto Glass, LLC, has filed a motion for rehearing, clarification, certification, and/or written opinion concerning its motions for appellate attorneys' fees. We deny the motion insofar as it seeks certification, clarification, and/or written opinion. We grant the motion as to rehearing regarding Petitioner's motion for conditional appellate attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the second-tier petition for writ of certiorari filed in this court. We further grant the motion for rehearing regarding the circuit court's denial of Shazam's motion for a conditional award of appellate attorneys' fees. This court's order dated September 13, 2019, is withdrawn, and this order is substituted therefore. We further withdraw the opinion dated September 13, 2019, and substitute the attached opinion in its place.
The motion for conditional attorneys' fees filed by Respondent, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, pursuant to an offer of judgment under section 768.79(1), Florida Statutes (2018), is granted to the extent that the trial court shall set a fee amount for this appellate proceeding in favor of Respondent only if the ultimate judgment obtained is one of no liability or is at least twenty-five percent less than the offer of settlement and upon a determination of entitlement pursuant to section 768.79.
The motion for conditional attorneys' fees filed by Petitioner is granted pursuant to section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (2018). The motion is granted to the extent that the trial court shall set a fee amount for this appellate proceeding in favor of Petitioner only if Petitioner ultimately prevails at trial, taking into account the fact that Petitioner has not prevailed on all issues and the degree to which this has extended the litigation or increased its costs. See Danis Indus. Corp. v. Ground Improv. Techniques, Inc., 645 So. 2d 420, 421 (Fla. 1994).
Petitioner's October 21, 2019, and October 22, 2019, motions to strike are denied.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A
TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.
MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
SHAZAM AUTO GLASS, LLC, as assignee ) of Christine Jennings, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) V. ) Case No. 2D19-649 ) STATE FARM MUT. AUTOMOBILE INS. ) CO., ) ) Respondent. )
Opinion filed January 15, 2020.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Gregory P. Holder, Judge.
David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A, Tampa; and Christopher Ligori and Ronald S. Haynes of Christopher Ligori & Associates, Tampa, for Petitioner.
Ezequiel Lugo of Banker Lopez Gassler, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We grant in part Shazam Auto Glass, LLC's petition for writ of certiorari and quash the circuit court's order to the extent that it may be construed to independently exercise jurisdiction over and quash the county court's March 9, 2018, discovery order. This includes that portion of the decision denying appellate attorneys' fees. We remand with directions to grant Shazam's motion for appellate attorneys' fees incurred in defending the March 9, 2018, order on appeal, contingent upon it ultimately prevailing in the case. In all other respects, the petition is denied.
LaROSE, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.