J. EDWARD LAWLER AND LEONARD ABRAMS, AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF FLORENCE H. LAWLER, DECEASED, APPELLANTS,

v.

GEORGE H. PRATT AND CECILIA A. PRATT, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Burton v. Walker, 231 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)
  …s Corporation v. State ex rel. Goldner, Fla.App. 1966, 181 So. 2d 552; State ex rel. [*22] Gore v. Chillingworth, Fla.1936, 126 Fla. 645, 171 So. 649; Dykes v. Dykes, Fla. App. 1958, 104 So. 2d 598; State ex rel. Schonberger v. Kelly, Fla.App. 1962, 143 So. 2d 329; Anderson Nat. Bank v. Luck-ett, 321 U.S. 233, 64 S.Ct. 599, 88 L.Ed. 692; Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734; 6 Fla.Jur., Constitutional Law, §§ 320-323, 326; 16 Am.Jur.2d, Constitutional Law, §§ 569, 572. In the cas…
• Sharp v. Sharp, 209 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
  …pt, or that the Court intended to do this. In proceedings for indirect or constructive contempt, due process requires that the accused be given notice of the charge and a reasonable opportunity to meet it by way of defense. State v. Kelly, Fla.App., 143 So. 2d 329. Dykes v. Dykes, Fla.App., 104 So. 2d 598. Appellees take the position that the contempt charged here constituted direct contempt. Obviously, the acts in question were committed out of the presence of the Court. A contempt proceeding is direct where…

Authorities Cited

• BAY Shore v. Steckloff, 107 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)