HUNTLEY BROS., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, L. L. HUNTLEY, AND W. T. HUNTLEY, APPELLANTS,
v.
W. H. HUNTLEY, APPELLEE
HUNTLEY BROS., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, L. L. HUNTLEY, AND W. T. HUNTLEY, APPELLANTS,
W. H. HUNTLEY, APPELLEE
143 So. 2d 330
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1962)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Interlocutory appeal dismissed. See Finley v. Finley, 103 So.2d 191 (Fla.1958); Means v. Douglas, 110 So.2d 88 (Fla.App.1959), and Mickler v. Smith, 111 So.2d 457 (Fla.App.1959).
CARROLL, DONALD K., C. J., and STURGIS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lewis v. Rogers, 164 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)…her proceedings consistent with the views set forth herein. Reversed. STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur. . Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Trusell (Fla.1961), 131 So. 2d 730. . Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Manning et al. (Fla.App.1962), 143 So. 2d 330. . Sirmons v. Pittman et al. (Fla.App.1962), 138 So. 2d 765.…
-
The Greyhound Corp. v. Carswell, 171 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)…t is apparent, therefore, that this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and the same must be and it is hereby dismissed. See Oxford v. Polk Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 147 So. 2d 603 (Fla.App.); Huntley Bros., Inc. v. Huntley, 143 So. 2d 330 (Fla.App.); Central National Ins. Co. of Omaha v. Piotrowski, 143 So. 2d 103 (Fla.App.); Kaemmerlen v. Shannon, 119 So. 2d 315 (Fla.App.); Means v. Douglas, 110 So. 2d 88 (Fla.); Finley v. Finley, 103 So. 2d 191 (Fla.); Haley v. Milam, 100 So. 2d 64…
Authorities Cited
- Means v. Douglas, 110 So. 2d 88 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)
- Williams v. Levine, 103 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1958)
- Finley v. Coralee Russell Finley, 103 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1958)
- Mickler v. W. H. Smith and his wife, 111 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)