GREGORY FRANK TOTH
v.
STEPHANIE MILLER - TOTH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial judge must exercise independent decision-making in entering a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage case, and adoption of a party's proposed judgment without alteration, when viewed in context of the record and the judge's comments, may violate this requirement.
[1] A trial judge must exercise independent decision-making when entering a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage case, and the adoption of a party's proposed judgment…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the record as a whole in this case creates the appearance that the amended judgment does not reflect the judge's independent decision-making”
Court's statement of the dispositive issue in the appeal
Gregory Frank Toth appealed a final judgment dissolving his marriage to Stephanie Spielman Miller and a money judgment entered in favor of Ms. Miller.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dissolution Of Marriage cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, LAKELAND, FLORIDA
October 31, 2018
GREGORY FRANK TOTH, ) ) Appellant, ) )
V.
) STEPHANIE SPIELMAN MILLER, formerly known as STEPHANIE MILLER-TOTH, ) ) ) ) Appellee. ) ) Case Nos. 2D15-3835 2D16-289
CONSOLIDATED
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
Appellant's motion for rehearing is denied. On the court's own motion, the prior opinion dated August 31, 2018, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is issued in its place. No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THE FOREGOING IS A
TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL COURT ORDER.
MARY ELIZABETH KUENZEL, CLERK
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
GREGORY FRANK TOTH, Appellant, ) ) ) )
V.
) STEPHANIE SPIELMAN MILLER, formerly known as STEPHANIE MILLER-TOTH, ) ) ) ) Appellee. ) ) Case Nos. 2D15-3835 2D16-289
CONSOLIDATED
Opinion filed October 31, 2018.
Appeals from the Circuit Court for Lee County; G. Keith Cary, Judge.
Robert L. Donald of Law Office of Robert L. Donald, Fort Myers, for Appellant.
Margaret H. White-Small of Margaret H. White-Small, Attorney at Law, Ponte Vedra Beach, and Stacy L. Sherman of Stacy L. Sherman, P.A., Cape Coral, for Appellee.
KELLY, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, Gregory Frank Toth challenges the amended final judgment dissolving his marriage to Stephanie Spielman Miller and the money judgment entered in favor of Ms. Miller pursuant to the amended final judgment of dissolution. Mr. Toth raises a number of challenges to the amended judgment, one of which is dispositive.1 Berg-Perlow, 875 So. 2d 383, 390 (Fla. 2004).
The judge adopted Ms. Miller's proposed sixty-five-page final judgment without a single alteration. While this fact alone might not convince us the judge had failed to exercise independent decision-making, when viewed in the context of the record as a whole, and in particular some of the judge's comments at the final hearing, we face a scenario much like the one we described in Bishop v. Bishop, 47 So. 3d 326 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). There, we concluded that the "errors and omissions" in the judgment together with the circumstances under which it was entered did not establish that it was the product of the judge's own "thoughtful and independent analysis of the facts, the evidence presented, and the law that applies." Id. at 329 (citing Perlow, 875 So. 2d at 390).
Accordingly, we affirm the portion of the amended final judgment that dissolved the parties' marriage. We reverse the remainder of that judgment and remand with directions that the judge enter a final judgment reflecting his independent decisionmaking consistent with the evidence and applicable law. See id. at 331. In light of our reversal of the amended judgment, we also reverse the money judgment entered in favor of Ms. Miller pursuant to that judgment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.
1We decline to reach the other issues raised in the initial brief and express no opinion on the merits of Mr. Toth's claims.
NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.