CARLSON, ESTATE OF DAWN CARLSON
v.
RITCHIE, ESTATE OF PETER RITCHIE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellant failed to demonstrate reversible error warranting reversal of the trial court's judgment.
This case involves a dispute between the personal representative of Dawn Carlson's estate and Stephanie Ritchie, individually and as personal represen…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
MATTHEW CARLSON, as personal representative of the Estate of Dawn Carlson, deceased,
Appellant,
V.
STEPHANIE RITCHIE, individually, and STEPHANIE RITCHIE, as personal representative of the Estate of Peter Ritchie, deceased,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-1621
September 4, 2026
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christine Marlewski, Judge.
Valerie L. Leatherwood, Stephen A. Barnes, and Adam D. Rieth of Barnes Trial Group, Tampa, for Appellant.
Brandon J. Tyler and Mark D. Tinker of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
SLEET, Judge.
We have reviewed the briefs, the record on appeal, and the applicable authorities and had the benefit of oral argument in this tragic case. On the basis thereof, we agree with the trial court's analysis, and we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
SILBERMAN and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.